The Effects of Breakups on Culture and Christianity – Part I
May 16, 2022 | Christian Living, Dating, Relationships, Series, Wisdom | No Comments

Introduction
In the last century, there has been a shift in culture—a disruption in the status quo of relational interaction. Specifically, amidst the process of two people going from friendship to marriage. A new course has sieged the relational scene and is now dominating the arena, this course is what is known as dating. This paradigm shift has introduced a flood of new questions and concerns into all relationships across the spectrum—be it friendships, familial relationships, workplace relationships, or the actual romantic interest that is intended to lead to marriage (or not lead to marriage). The subtopic up for discussion here is the breakups that result from this dating paradigm. Although it has been over a century since the dating and breakup paradigms have entered society, counselors, pastors, and average church people are still ill-equipped to handle them; consequently, this topic needs to be analyzed, processed, and addressed through a proper, psychological, and biblical lens.
Context—A Burden Carried
With the shift in courtship, romantic interest, and dating storming the culture, inevitably the church is seeing the effects of this young paradigm as well. There are countless divorced people, widowed spouses, young adults, and teenagers that have been reared knowing nothing but a romantic pursuit that is filled with rejection, risk, heartbreak, and turmoil (Young and Adams 2001, 60). Breakups seemingly strike these demographics in ways that are detrimental to their hearts (speaking of the inner man; the thoughts, passions, desires, feelings, and wants) and relational health (Thomas 2021, 30-41). Sadly, breakups have been normalized as if people are expendable, as if hearts are not fragile, as if relationships are for individuals. This culture that has been created around serial dating—a term used in Jonathan Pokluda’s new book, Outdated: Find Love That Lasts When Dating Has Changed—has produced serial breakups and is leaving the church in great need (Pokluda 2021, 171). Through a proper biblical lens, there is hope for those ransacked by this paradigm shift and the negative effects thereof.
A History of Dating—Briefly Covered
The history of dating is easily tracked given the slim amount of time that society has had to adapt to it as a regularity; however, there are not many easily-accessible resources on the history of dating. Dating finds its origins in the early 1900s, storming the forefront of culture and publicity in the 1920s (Getlin, 2016). Larry Getlin makes note of this in his article, commenting on the primary source that will be under review in this section, Labor of Love: the Invention of Dating. One fact worthy of noting is that Labor of Love: the Invention of Dating is a history of the dating paradigm from the perspective of a feminist, Moira Weigel. However, there is still much to be gleaned from her comments and research about dating and its origins.
The concept of dating formed as an alternative and outflow from a classic courtship model; some time will be spent on the differences and contrast of these two in a later section of this writing. A “need” seemed to rise for women as society began to see women going into cities—leaving homes, farms, and small businesses—to work jobs in mainstream companies. Moira Weigel would define dating as, “the form that courtship takes in a society where it takes place in a free market” (2016, 7). To Weigel’s point, as America was shifting in its culture, romantic pursuit began to inadvertently adapt. No longer were traditional parents setting up their children through family members and matchmakers, like in the Old Country where a community was the controlling element of courtship (Weigel 2016, 14). Courting and dating are used in modern days nearly interchangeably, but this is not the truth. The two are drastically different, and understanding this difference is key in obtaining a solid perspective of dating in its roots.
It is important to understand the heart behind dating as well, referring to the motives and intents that dating spawned from and ushered people towards. Weigel summarizes this by stating,
The old-fashioned practices of chaperoned courtship and calling had drawn clear lines between the worlds of men and women. Dating undid them. It took courtship out of the private sphere and into the public places. It transferred control over the process from the older generation to the younger generation, from the group to the individual, and from women to men. (Weigel 2016, 20)
One will notice the three major contrasts that Weigel takes note of in the final sentence of her paragraph. There was a reluctance toward any form of Biblical authority. No longer did young people want to be told by their parents who to marry. No longer did people want to have others holding them accountable in a family-group setting. No longer did women want to be the ones submitting to men in the leading of the courting process. Though there are without doubt some good notes to be taken in terms of individual discernment and mutual interest regarding romantic pursuit, there is an obvious sense of rebellion that had awoken as society shifted from courting to dating.
This history is crucial when discussing breakups; without it one cannot grasp the full scope of where and how breakups entered the timeline of romantic pursuits. A couple more noteworthy facts should be mentioned before moving on. First, the term dating was coined in 1896 by a writer named George Ade. Ade wrote in a weekly column for The Chicago Record and wrote a story in which a young man confronted a girl who began to see other men. In the story, the young man is recorded as saying, “I s’pose the other boy’s fillin’ all my dates?” (referring to the dates on the calendar)—thus the “date” was born (Weigel 2016, 12). Last, dating was viewed in a very negative sense by much of society as it began to come to the forefront of romance in the early 1900s. Weigel writes extensively about how women were viewed, but Getlin summarizes her records well in his article. He says, “When those single women, stripped from their dependency on fathers and husbands, began to be courted in public, police, politicians, and civic leaders were alarmed” (Getlin, 2016). Much more could be covered on dating and its origins. The grand takeaways for the sake of this writing should be that dating was an adaptation and mutation of a prior form of romantic pursuit known as courtship, the heart of dating was not one of godly origins, and dating was not viewed in a positive light by the mainstream media for decades.
References
Bancroft, J. “The Endocrinology of Sexual Arousal.” joe. BioScientifica, September 1, 2005. https://joe.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/joe/186/3/1860411.xml.
Baucham, Voddie. What He Must Be…if He Wants to Marry My Daughter. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books, 2009.
Buss, David M. 2019. “The Evolution of Love in Humans.” In The New Psychology of Love, edited by Sternberg, Robert J., and Karin Sternberg, 42-63. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Cloud, Henry, and John Townsend. Boundaries in Dating: How Healthy Choices Grow Healthy Relationships. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2000.
Eggerichs, Emerson. Love & Respect: the Respect He Desperately Needs. Nashville, TN: Integrity Publishers, 2004.
Eisenman, Russell. “Scientific Insights Regarding the Orgasm: Europe’s Journal of Psychology.” Scientific Insights Regarding the Orgasm| Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 2008.https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/430/html.
Eldredge, John, and Stasi Eldredge. Captivating: Unveiling the Mystery of a Woman’s Soul. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2010.
Eldredge, John. Wild at Heart: Discovering the Secret of a Man’s Soul. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2010.
Farrel, Bill, and Pam Farrel. Single Men Are Like Waffles, Single Women Are Like Spaghetti: Friendship, Romance, and Relationships That Work. Eugene, OR: Harvest House Pub, 2008.
Field, Tiffany. “Romantic Breakups, Heartbreak and Bereavement-Romantic Breakups.” Psychology. Scientific Research Publishing, July 25, 2011. https://www.scirp.org/html/6296.html.
Getlen, Larry. “The Fascinating History of How Courtship Became ‘Dating’.” New York Post. New York Post, July 26, 2017. https://nypost.com/2016/05/15/the-fascinating-history-of-how-courtship-became-dating/.
Harris, Joshua. I Kissed Dating Goodbye. Sisters, OR: Multnomah Publishers, 2003.
Lane, Timothy S. Sex before Marriage: How Far Is Too Far? New Growth Press, 2009.
Ludy, Eric, and Leslie Ludy. When God Writes Your Love Story: the Ultimate Guide to Guy/Girl Relationships. Colorado Springs, CO: Multnomah Books, 2009.
Masonheimer, Phylicia. Stop Calling Me Beautiful. Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, U.S, 2020.
Parrott, Les, and Leslie L. Parrott. Saving Your Marriage before It Starts: Seven Questions to Ask before–and after–Your Marriage. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2015.
Pokluda, Jonathan, and Kevin McConaghy. Outdated: Find Love That Lasts When Dating Has Changed. Baker Books, a division of Baker Publishing Group, 2021.
“Psychology.” Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, 2021. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/psychology.
Thomas, Gary. The Sacred Search: What If It’s Not about Who You Marry, but Why? Colorado Springs, CO: David C Cook, 2021.
Unger, Merrill F. The New UNGER’S Bible Dictionary. Edited by R. K. Harrison, Howard Frederic Vos, and Cyril J. Barber. Moody Publishers, 2005.
Weigel, Moira. Labor of Love: The Invention of Dating. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2016.
Young, Ben, and Sam Adams. The One: a Realistic Guide to Choosing Your Soul Mate. Nashville, TN: T. Nelson Publishers, 2001.